Evidence examples

Findings should show the evidence behind the risk.

Atomation turns Okta posture into reviewable findings. That includes surfacing group-rule dependency issues such as cascading rules, duplicate conditions, and access paths that are hard to follow from a spreadsheet, plus licensing and alerting signals that matter before a renewal or audit.

Atomation group rules screen showing cascading dependency evidence
Cascading group-rule dependencies can be flagged as reviewable evidence.
Finding context

Evidence is packaged for investigation, not just presentation.

Atomation users screen showing licensed users and users with no sign-in recorded
Licensed users with no sign-in history can become renewal-planning evidence.
License utilization

Savings conversations need specific users, counts, and SKU context.

Atomation can highlight users consuming seats who have never logged in or have not logged in for a selected review window. When customer-provided agreement or SKU context is available, the report can also show where purchased Okta capabilities appear underused and should be reviewed before renewal.

Report handoff

The same evidence can support leadership, operators, and auditors.

The customer-facing report stays concise. The detailed operator view can carry full finding context, screenshots, affected objects, control mappings, and analyst notes when deeper validation is needed.

Export paths
  • Reports: PDF, DOCX, and Markdown
  • Findings: CSV and JSON
  • Raw snapshot export: JSON, without customer secrets or Atomation operational data
Public examples are representative

Public screenshots use cropped or sanitized demo data. Exact rule thresholds, scoring internals, customer-specific detections, and customer evidence stay out of public copy.

Get started

Want evidence like this from your Okta org?

Book a free discovery call. We'll map your workflow, find the highest-value automation, and show you the smallest useful first build — no obligation.