One Okta assessment, multiple compliance lenses.
The same identity evidence can be organized for different regulatory programs. Atomation keeps the detection layer consistent and changes the report language for the framework in scope.
HIPAA
HIPAA Okta Security Review
For healthcare and healthcare-adjacent teams that need practical identity evidence around access control, workforce access, activity review, and secure operations.
Open page SOX ITGCSOX ITGC
SOX ITGC Okta Access Review
For finance, SaaS, and public-company teams that need stronger evidence around access governance, privileged access, change risk, and sensitive business apps.
Open page CMMCCMMC
CMMC Identity Posture Review for Okta
For contractors and regulated suppliers who need identity controls reviewed through a CMMC lens without sending raw identity data to third-party AI systems.
Open page GLBA / FFIECGLBA / FFIEC
GLBA and FFIEC Okta Posture Review
For financial services and advisory teams that need clear identity evidence for safeguarding customer information and managing privileged access risk.
Open pageNIST-style controls stay the backbone.
Atomation treats framework mapping as metadata on findings. A single detection can cite the right control language for HIPAA, SOX ITGC, CMMC, or GLBA/FFIEC without changing how the Okta issue is detected.
- Framework coverage at a glance for leadership.
- Finding-level control mapping for audit evidence.
- Plain-language remediation guidance for the technical owner.
Need your Okta evidence organized around a specific framework?
Book a free discovery call. We'll map your workflow, find the highest-value automation, and show you the smallest useful first build — no obligation.