Start with a baseline assessment. Add an on-demand follow-up review or remediation support only when the finding queue and business pressure justify it. Automated scheduling, drift comparison, and trends remain roadmap work.
A focused Okta assessment for audit prep, diligence, renewal planning, implementation handoff, incident review, or a leadership update.
Planned scheduled re-scans, drift comparison, and trend reporting. These capabilities are not part of the current production portal and should not be sold as live.
Scoped follow-up help for teams that want Atomation-supported review, prioritization, and resolution planning after the first report.
The page should explain Atomation through movement: finding volume, owner routing, evidence packaging, and a later on-demand scan without implying automated trend analysis.
Privileged access, stale assignments, and missing evidence move into one queue.
Review sessions route the highest-risk findings and attach the proof trail.
A later scan creates a new point-in-time result. Automated drift comparison and trend reporting are roadmap features.
Baseline and remediation support are current service paths. A later assessment can be run on demand. Automated schedules, drift comparison, trend reporting, and enforced retention tiers are not current production capabilities.
Point-in-time posture, findings, and evidence package.
A new on-demand assessment and manual before-and-after review.
Review sessions, prioritized fix plan, and handoff context.
The assessment scope follows the evidence needed, desired manual follow-up, and hosted delivery path.
The first report should decide whether a baseline is enough or whether a manual follow-up review or remediation support is worth adding.
